
Fans will be treated this season to the full judgements made by the Key Match Incidents Panel (KMI), as one of three measures introduced by the Premier League to improve transparency.
The Key Match Incidents Panel, as is typical with refereeing decisions both on and off-pitch since the introduction of VAR, was the source of controversy last season.
Until now, full judgements made by the five sitting members of the Panel have been kept private; however, the Premier League is looking to break that tradition, which has been the case since 2022.
Clubs receive the complete report, which includes direct comments from members of the Panel, and tend to leak information from the judgement, but this will no longer be necessary during the 2026-27 season.
Advert
The Panel, which meets every week to dissect various decisions, comprises three former players and coaches, and a representative from both the Premier League and the referees’ body Pro Ref. A unanimous decision among all five members isn't needed to deem a decision correct or incorrect, only a majority vote.
Key, often controversial, incidents are reviewed by the KMI Panel, taking into account the laws of the game and the expectation for how English top-flight games should be officiated. There were 25 VAR errors last season, as published in the Panel's secret judgements, according to the BBC, which was up from 18 in 2024-25.
The Panel doesn’t cause controversy — that arrives through the incidents themselves; however, it does not possess powers to rectify the errors they find, inciting anger among fans. Now, supporters will have access to the full judgements, in a move that could cause further chaos for referees and among followers of the aggrieved clubs.
Premier League announce public viewership of KMI Panel judgements
Another of the three measures introduced to improve transparency is selected direct quotes from the officials involved in an incident being made publicly available, via the Premier League Match Centre account on X.
Previously, the account provided general overviews of the incident in question; however, referees will now explain their decisions in real-time with direct quotes published online.
In addition, a full document in the days post-match, which is assessed and voted on by all five members of the KMI Panel, will be made available for the public to read.
Finally, the newly-introduced Ref Cam will be expanded to include audio, meaning fans will be able to hear how the referee describes his decisions on-field to the players and teams involved.
In combination, these three measures should make it far more difficult for controversial decisions to occur, with accountability from officials being promoted.
Andy Burnham, an outspoken critic of VAR who announced his intentions to ban the technology, if he had the power, saw his beloved Everton receive a dagger to the heart courtesy of the KMI Panel last season.
READ MORE: VAR’s most powerful opponent yet wants Premier League ban
The Toffees collapsed at the climax in a blockbuster 3-3 draw with Manchester City, as Pep Guardiola’s men clung on for dear life in the Premier League title race.
In the days after the match, the Panel released a judgement that acknowledged Everton were wrongfully denied a penalty in the second half, which could have provided the Toffees with a vital three points. At the time, Moyes’ men were battling for Europe, which they failed to secure.
Despite these three measures being significant improvements, total transparency is still limited by IFAB's refusal to allow the live broadcast of VAR discussions.
Last season, Chelsea and Bournemouth topped the VAR ‘decisions in favour’ chart with four; Arsenal followed with three.
Everton and Crystal Palace topped the chart for ‘errors against’ with three each, one of which for the Toffees was the wrongfully denied penalty versus Guardiola’s men.
Topics: Premier League, Football, VAR