
Manchester City are still awaiting the outcome of their case involving 115 charges, and Premier League chief Richard Masters has offered his latest verdict on the situation.
Back in February 2023, the Premier League accused Man City of 115 financial breaches between 2009 and 2018, but they're still awaiting an official verdict three-and-a-half years later.
Throughout the entire ordeal, City have denied any wrongdoing and would face several possible sanctions if found guilty, including expulsion from England's top flight or being stripped of the titles they won during the nine-year period.
Man City's hearing in their case against the Premier League ran across 12 weeks between September and December 2024, with suggestions that the timeframe between the hearing and the judgment would take months given the sheer volume of information involved.
Advert
City have since spent £690 million on new players since being charged and have won six major trophies, including two domestic trophies and the Champions League.
But despite continuing to achieve success on and off the pitch, there is no definitive timeline for when a verdict will be reached or whether the Cityzens will be punished.
That has been a cause of frustration for many of their rivals in the competition, as well as Premier League chief Richard Masters, who has expressed his annoyance at the situation.
“Our rules are very clear about that – I have to keep everything confidential until we’re ready to hand down a decision and be clear about it. I can’t give any update on timing or what’s happening," Masters told Sky News.
“There’s only one available route through this, which is to allow the process to take its course.
“It has taken longer than expected, and I do understand the frustrations.”
In June, it was revealed that four of City's rivals - Tottenham, Arsenal, Liverpool and Manchester United - could all claim £100 million in compensation if they are found guilty.
But it appears they may be waiting a while to see that potential nine-figure sum.
Richard Masters discusses Chelsea's Premier League punishment
City are not the only club to be charged for breaching Premier League rules, with Everton, Nottingham Forest and Leicester City all falling foul of Profit and Sustainability in recent seasons, receiving point deductions as a result.
Most recently, Chelsea were fined £10m and given a suspended transfer ban for breaching 74 rules relating to payment to agents.
READ NEXT: FA confirm significant punishments for Chelsea after 74 rule breaches
Explaining the difference between City's and Chelsea's case, Masters said: "In the situation with Chelsea, obviously it's historic. It's very different to PSR cases. In the case of Chelsea, the new owners came forward with all the information, and we decided to enter a sanction agreement.
"That sanction agreement was overseen by a commission as well, and part of the role of the commission is to assure that that sanction is not unduly lenient.
"I think the key difference is, given the evidence base and given the lack of witnesses, none of the people involved with these payments are still at the club, we're not able to interview them, the evidence base isn't complete.
"The alternative to entering the sanction agreement was to go down a contested commission route. I'm not sure we'd have been able to bring all of the charges that the club ultimately admitted to, or be successful in getting them, so I don't think there was an easy choice for the board to make.
"We took a decision that the sanction agreement was the best thing for the league, and we're fully aware that not everyone agrees that that was the right course of action, and we just have to accept that."
Topics: Premier League, Football News, Transfer News