• Football
  • Boxing
  • UFC
  • Home
  • Football
    • England
    • Transfer News
    • Premier League
    • Champions League
    • Lionel Messi
    • Cristiano Ronaldo
    • EA FC 25
    • Wrexham
  • Boxing
    • Tyson Fury
    • Anthony Joshua
    • Oleksandr Usyk
    • Mike Tyson
    • Jake Paul
    • Logan Paul
  • UFC
    • Dana White
    • Conor McGregor
    • Khabib Nurmagomedov
    • Jon Jones
    • Paddy Pimblett
    • Joe Rogan
  • Other Sport
    • Athletics
    • Formula 1
    • MMA
    • Motorsport
    • NBA
    • Darts
    • NFL
    • Snooker
    • Wrestling
    • Tennis
    • Cricket
    • Golf
  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • LADbible
  • UNILAD
  • GAMINGbible
  • Tyla
  • UNILAD Tech
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
Threads
Snapchat
TikTok
YouTube
How much money did clubs receive for releasing players for the 2022 World Cup?

Home> Football> Football News> FIFA World Cup

Updated 16:30 13 Jul 2023 GMT+1Published 16:21 13 Jul 2023 GMT+1

How much money did clubs receive for releasing players for the 2022 World Cup?

Manchester City top list for most money received at the 2022 World Cup.

Joe Adams

Joe Adams

The World Cup's winter timing left many Premier League teams frustrated about the season's temporary halt, but some clubs may have had half an eye on their bank accounts.

Several managers would have been praying for all of their players competing in Qatar to come home in one piece, with the tournament a breeding ground for injuries in the past.

However, some owners may have been hoping for their players' countries to progress through the competition, knowing that there were financial rewards for the longer a player remained there.

Advert

The payments are a part of FIFA's "Club Benefits Programme", with all the information published in a new report.

On their official website, FIFA describes how the system was designed to recognise the contribution that clubs across the world make in helping stage the World Cup.

Compensation was paid not only to the club from each individual player was released by, but also to any club that the player has represented in the two years prior to the World Cup.

For instance, in the case of Jack Grealish, both Manchester City and Aston Villa would have been financial beneficiaries of the Englishman's progress.

Advert

According to their website, FIFA distributed $209 million (£160.9 million) among all six confederations in football for players's involvement in the World Cup,

That pot was split among 440 clubs, with a total of 837 players earning their clubs some extra dough.

Clubs are paid a total of $10,950 (£8,429) per player for every day that they are at the tournament, while that figure is not dependent on a players' minutes or related to their performance at the tournament.

The report revealed that European clubs - who made up 76 per cent of players at the tournament - received by the most money at $158.90m (£122.32m), a stark comparison from the Asian Football Confederation who were handed a measly $23.78m (£18.31m).

Advert

Within Europe, English clubs again received the most income from via FIFA's scheme, as they took home $37.70m (£29.03m).

This was followed by teams in Spain at $24.40m (£18.78m), Germany $21m (£16.17m), while Italy - who didn't even qualify for the World Cup - saw their clubs receive $18.70m (£14.40m). French sides completed the top five with $16.60 (£12.78m) in compensation.

In the Premier League, Manchester City were the biggest beneficiaries by some distance as they were given $4.60m (£3.54m) for the 16 players present at the World Cup.

Close behind them were both Chelsea and Manchester United who brought in $3.30m (£2.51m), while Tottenham $2.80m (£2.18m) and Liverpool $2.40m (£1.86m) were also among the clubs who received the most.

Advert

However, the tournament was not so fruitful for other English teams. Bournemouth - who only had Welshmen Kieffer Moore and Chris Mepham in Qatar - received just $0.38m (£0.30m), while Southampton's $0.52m (£0.40m) and Nottingham Forest's $0.58m (£0.45m) profits were of little worth.

Featured Image Credit: Getty Images

Topics: Football World Cup, Football, Premier League, Manchester City, Liverpool, Manchester United, Chelsea

Joe Adams
Joe Adams

Joe is a Journalist for SPORTbible with a primary focus on football. He has previously covered a number of other sports including boxing, rugby and F1. Wishes he was born left-footed.

X

@joeadamsjourno

Advert

Advert

Advert

Choose your content:

2 hours ago
4 hours ago
  • Getty
    2 hours ago

    Rio Ferdinand Has One Condition for Interviewing John Terry

    The Manchester United legend has set one rule for interviewing his former teammate.

    Football
  • Getty
    4 hours ago

    Maccabi Tel Aviv Derby Cancelled Amid Aston Villa Stadium Ban Following Riots

    The Israeli club's match against their fiercest rival has been called off days after being banned from Villa Park.

    Football
  • Getty
    4 hours ago

    Zinedine Zidane Picked Who Was 'Key' For England Between Steven Gerrard And Frank Lampard

    The France and Real Madrid legend made his decision about the midfield duo.

    Football
  • Getty
    4 hours ago

    Rangers Turned Down By Second Manager 'At 11th Hour' After Steven Gerrard Snub

    Gerrard pulled out of the Rangers managerial race on Wednesday - and now a second manager is having doubts.

    Football
  • Saudi Arabia Public Investment Fund eyeing purchase of another European club
  • Why June 30th is the new deadline day for top European clubs across the world
  • How much did FSG pay for Liverpool?
  • Liverpool or Man Utd could receive £50m windfall in FIFA Club World Cup revamp